Issues No. 02 The Brief
The Operator's Brief · No. 02 · Go-to-market · Channel

Eight and a Half Phone Calls

Some of the people who send you work spend somebody else's money and their own afternoon. They are not choosing you on price. What they are choosing on never shows up on your invoice.

Get each new issue free
What this issue finds

Axiom shows why some referral channels compete on the referrer's time rather than your price, using Enterprise Rent-A-Car's insurance-replacement business and its adjuster-booking system, and gives operators a way to sort which of their referrers chooses on convenience and which on cost.

01
What was Enterprise actually selling, if it was never the rate?

She called three times to book one car

An insurance adjuster in the early 1990s has a straightforward claim on her desk. A driver has been rear-ended, the car is going into a shop for eleven days, the policy covers a rental. She needs a car for him today.

She calls a rental branch. Whoever answers cannot book it. She calls back. The second person cannot book it either. On the third or fourth try she reaches somebody who can. That is three calls to start one rental, and the rental has eleven days left to run. It gets extended when the shop slips, queried, closed out. Every one of those is her phone again. That is a normal day for her, and she has dozens of open claims.

In 1994 Geico Direct and Safeco went to Enterprise Rent-A-Car and told them the phone calls were the problem, not the daily rate. Enterprise built a system to take them out. Across the life of a rental, by their own count, it removed an average of 8.5 of them.

Exhibit 01
The carriers wired into the system grew at least twice as fast
Enterprise insurance-replacement revenue growth, 1998 to 2000, overall and with its largest carrier customers.
All insurance-replacement business
+35%
Business with the largest carriers, wired into the system
+70% to +105%Same fleet, same rate card
NOTES · Same fleet, same rate card, same branches across both figures. The only stated difference is whether the carrier's adjusters were connected to the booking system. Not a controlled experiment.
SOURCES · CIO magazine reporting Enterprise's own calculation, in Auto Rental News, 2004. The 8.5 calls is Enterprise's own number.
02
Why did the rate never matter to her?

She was not spending her own money

The daily rate came off her employer's books. She wasn't measured on it. By Friday she couldn't have told you what it was. The phone calls came out of her afternoon, and she felt every one. Eight and a half of them at three minutes each is half an hour, per car, and she was not booking one car a week. So she chose whichever branch cost her the least time, rather than the one charging the least money.

She never once chose them on price.

That gap decides whether any of this applies to you. Where the person who picks you also pays you, price competes. Where they are spending somebody else's money, your rate barely registers and your convenience is close to everything.

03
Which of the people who send me work is the adjuster?

The same three calls, in your business

It is Tuesday and a tenant's kitchen sink is backing up. The property manager calls your shop. Whoever picks up cannot tell her when anyone can get there. She calls again after lunch. On the third try she reaches your dispatcher and gets a window of Thursday, sometime.

None of that is work she is paid for. Her fee is a percentage of the rent she collects, the same whether that unit needs nothing all year or needs you six times. The repair goes on the owner's statement. The three calls come out of her Tuesday. She is your adjuster. So is the restoration adjuster, the facilities manager, the warranty coordinator, and the realtor who needs a listing ready by Friday and is not paying your invoice either.

Exhibit 02
Only one of these five referrers is decided on price
Common referrer types in field service, sorted by whether the person choosing you is also the person paying you.
Property manager billing an ownerMeasured on rent collected, not work coordinatedRun it
Insurance restoration adjusterClaims closed and cycle time. The carrier already set your rateRun it
Realtor prepping a listingClosings. Every day of delay is her moneyRun it
Facilities manager with a budget lineBudget variance, so partly price sensitive after allWorth a month
Home warranty companySets your rate as a condition of entry and dispatches by algorithmSkip it
NOTES · The test for any referrer not listed is what that person is personally measured on. If your work does not appear in it, they are choosing on time. If it does, they are choosing on price.
SOURCES · Property-management fee structures from current industry fee guides, 2025–2026. Remaining rows are Axiom's classification.

Take the biggest name in the first group. A touch is any moment your work costs them time: every call to reach you, every call they take from their own customer asking where you are, every re-sent address, every invoice returned because the unit number was wrong.

Exhibit 03
What one referrer spends on you, in her hours rather than your dollars
Move the three sliders to your own referrer. Illustrative model, not measured data.
Hours of her year, spent on the privilege of using you
16.0
NOTES · Hours equal jobs × touches × minutes ÷ 60. On these defaults you are also giving this referrer about $3,000 a year in discount, which lands on the owner's statement, where she will never feel it.
SOURCES · Axiom model. Defaults are illustrative; your own numbers replace them.

You are paying three thousand dollars a year for the thing she notices least. Do not read this as license to raise your price. The referrer does not feel your rate, but the payer does, and the payer is usually a carrier with a schedule. The move is that you stop buying the referral with a discount nobody ever noticed.

04
What do I do, and what won't this do?

Stand in the room in 1994

Two options, one budget. Which do you fund?
Most operating instinct says cut the rate, because removing the calls looks like real money spent to please somebody with no budget authority. Decide before you read on.
By 2004 Enterprise held more than 85% of insurance replacement. Then the same connectivity reached every small competitor, and its share did not move.

That tells you what holds the position now, and it is not the software. It is national coverage no competitor can match, and none of that is for sale to you. So be clear about what you are buying. Taking work off a referrer's desk will win you a channel, but it will not keep you in it. Assume anything you build is copyable inside a year and plan on having to be first again.

Enterprise never really won the adjuster's business. They won her afternoon back, and the business came with it.
Know an operator still competing on price?
Part 02 · The Workup
You’ve felt the wound. Now measure it in your own numbers — the full model, and a calculator set to your plan.
Read the Workup →
Before you go

Get the next issue the day it drops.

One case, one number you believe that turns out wrong, the model and the play. Free, the first Sunday, in your inbox before it goes anywhere else.

No spam, no teasers, no dark patterns. One click to leave.
Already running these on your own jobs? The reading stays free. The Bench is the tools. See The Bench · $49/mo →

Published with this issue · the four moves, the three text messages ready to send, and how each referrer is really paid. Axiom Research · The Operator's Brief · No. 02

Saved. Check your inbox.